A Defensive Hand
Some plays can be worked out at the table. Some can’t. How do you feel about this one?
| Dlr: North | ♠ K | |
| Vul: N-S | ♥ A K 10 | |
| ♦ A Q 5 | ||
| ♣ Q J 10 9 7 3 | ||
| ♠ 10 9 7 | ♠ A 8 6 5 4 2 | |
| ♥ J 9 7 3 2 | ♥ 8 6 | |
| ♦ 8 6 4 | ♦ K 9 7 3 | |
| ♣ K 8 | ♣ A | |
| ♠ Q J 3 | ||
| ♥ Q 5 4 | ||
| ♦ J 10 2 | ||
| ♣ 6 5 42 |
| West | North | East | South |
| 1♣ | 1♠ | Pass | |
| Pass | Dbl | Pass | 1NT |
| 2♠ | 2NT | Pass | 3NT |
| All Pass |
For a change, I will show you all four hands. Here is what did happen. West led the ♠10 and East grabbed it. He did not say it, but he thought to himself that aces are meant to take kings. Having won the first trick, East now started to think. He returned a spade. South won and gave East a club trick. East set up his spades but when West got in with his ♣K, declarer had the rest. Did East really do anything wrong here?
East got too busy. The lead and the bidding marked South with the ♠QJ. East must let the ♠K win trick one. When in with the ♣A East must lead a small spade, giving South the second of his spade tricks. Now when West gets in with the ♣K he has a spade left to lead to East. East’s defense is predicated on West’s having the ♣K for the reason that 3NT is not likely to go down if South has it.
You can find reasons for East to do differently on defense, for instance winning the spade and leading a diamond. This might work on a different layout. What is important is that East see the possibility of ducking the first spade.
Looks like East should have spent more time thinking before playing to trick one, not after.